Description of the Map:Â
The map displays the median household income in the Tacoma, Washington area and its surrounding regions. The map is shaded in various tones of green, blue, and purple to represent different income levels across neighborhoods and districts.
Dark green areas indicate higher median household incomes.
Lighter green and shades of purple represent moderate income levels.
Blue areas depict lower income regions.
The map includes significant geographic markers such as Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Puyallup Reservation, and Squaxin Island Reservation. Insets at the bottom show the regional and national contexts.
Income Distribution: Higher median incomes are concentrated in the suburban and rural areas, primarily in the darker green regions, particularly to the north and west of Tacoma, and around Gig Harbor and the surrounding neighborhoods. This suggests more affluent residential areas with higher property values and possibly more exclusive housing developments.
Lower Income Zones: The lower-income areas, shaded in blue and light purple, are primarily clustered around the central urban areas, particularly near Tacoma, Lakewood, and parts of the Auburn and Kent areas. These zones may correspond with higher population density, older housing stock, and lower property values, indicating areas with potential economic challenges.
Joint Base Lewis-McChord: The blue area in the southern part of the map represents Joint Base Lewis-McChord, a major military base. The low income levels in this area highlight that military members are often not paid enough to match the local economy's high cost of living, contributing to lower household income figures compared to neighboring civilian areas. This economic disparity underscores the financial challenges faced by military families, especially in high-cost regions.
Geographic Income Patterns: There is a noticeable gradient where income levels tend to increase as you move away from urban centers towards more rural and suburban areas. This pattern is common in metropolitan regions where wealthier individuals often reside in suburban locales with more space and lower urban density.
Economic Segregation: The map illustrates clear economic divisions between different neighborhoods, which may reflect broader social and economic disparities such as differences in access to quality education, employment opportunities, and healthcare. The Puyallup and Squaxin Island Reservations also show varying income levels, often lower than neighboring areas, highlighting economic challenges faced by Indigenous communities.
Strategic Planning Insights: For city planners and policymakers, these patterns can inform decisions about resource allocation, economic development, and social services. Efforts to improve economic opportunities in lower-income neighborhoods through targeted investments and community support could help reduce disparities. Additionally, understanding the income landscape helps identify areas needing infrastructure improvements, affordable housing projects, and public transportation expansions.